Monday, May 24, 2010

Did anyone else think 10000 b.c was a disapointment?

Aside from the visual effects which were not that great. Did anyone else think the movie was a big let down? The acting, the storyline, the odd mix of ethnicities within his small tribe, the lame dialogue (telling the cat "don't eat me", how they got from mountains to desert in a breeze. I know its a hollywood movie but come on a little more realism would have been more engaging.

Did anyone else think 10000 b.c was a disapointment?
I got about 40 minutes into the movie i wanted to go home it was boring , predictable i lost the storyline within the first 15 minuets i give it 4 out of 10
Reply:you guys are so frikin picky i loved it!!! Would you rather it be in some language you didnt understand? and it was adventerous, romantic, action packed , and it had humor. they did get from mt. to desert in a breeze but would you rather them spend all that time filming the trip? and to tell the truth there are places like that.
Reply:so disssssapointed... i mean check the actors and actress they are so freakin modelled bodies and skin, they should at least get someone who is really just ordinary lookin peeps and throw them on the movie. the clothes its like a new fashion stlye and i got the feeling it might come out soon.


totally hollywood crap.


i mean watching discovery,national geograhic,history channels are more realistic,more detailed, more accurate, etc...
Reply:I was very disappointed! The only good thing was that I was sitting next to a really hot guy in the theater!
Reply:Eh...i didn't care about the realism at all. I watch the discovery channel for real stuff....i don't look to movies for that.





Although the woolly mammoths in the desert part was a little absurd.....i thought that was sorta the reason they died out.....climate was too warm, but no where near to being that hot.








Didn't quite hit the soo bad its good point either.





But yeah i thought it was horrible.


Apocolypto (which i guess is similarish) i thought was bad, but a ton better than this (but you do have mel gibsons anti-semetic tirade setting up the back-story for that movie and the retarded soundtrack).








I came to a realization a while back that if its not rated R, its not good.





This reconfirmed that.





No boobies was my #1 turn off point.





Lack of action was #2. ( i compare all action to hong kong standards though....nothing American ever gets close)





Lack of gratuitousness was #3.





Yeah and the dialogue was just lame too.





I thought the random ethnicities were funny though. Like the "bamboo men" (thats what we called them). They showed up for 2 minutes then decided not to man up to the occasion.





The white men that lived closer to the equator than the dark people had the random asian in their tribe?????. And what the hell with the dreads.
Reply:I loved it!!! i thought it was quite brilliant and they did a wonderful job! Seriously, how smart do you think the cavemen were back then? Give them a break. I find it very hard to make a realistic movie about 12,000 years ago. How the hell would we know what went down that long ago? I liked it a lot and found it very engaging! Just my opinion

aster

No comments:

Post a Comment